Bengaluru court says Kinetic Green cannot use Zulu name

    The name Zulu was sounding very close to Yulu, which prompted the latter to file a suit.

    Published On Mar 15, 2024 11:57:00 AM

    7,834 Views

    Kinetic Luna price, Yulu Wynn e-bike range.
    Listen to this Article

    In a legal battle over trademark infringement, a Bengaluru commercial court upheld a temporary injunction against Kinetic Green Energy and ruled in favour of Bajaj-owned Yulu. This injunction stops Kinetic Green from using, selling and advertising its Zulu e-scooter. This discussion comes following a dispute initiated by Yulu, alleging trademark violation with the launch of Kinetic Green’s Zulu e-scooter in December 2023.

    1. Karnataka High Court granted temporary injunction on Kinetic Zulu e-scooter
    2. Kinetic claims “Sulu ki Zulu” rhymes with CEO’s nickname

    Kinetic Green vs Yulu trademark dispute continues

    The conflict began in late January when Yulu filed a case with the city civil and sessions court, accusing Kinetic Green of infringing on its trademark rights. Although the initial injunction request by Yulu was denied, Kinetic Green was given an opportunity to present their arguments. Dissatisfied with the court’s decision, Yulu appealed to the High Court of Karnataka, which partially granted a temporary injunction in February, urging the commercial court to expedite the hearing process. 

    In defence, Kinetic Green Energy’s legal representatives emphasised that the adoption of the Zulu mark was rooted in by Sulajja Firodia Motwani, the founder and CEO of Kinetic Green, followed by the tagline “Sulu ki Zulu”, which rhymed with Sulajja’s nickname. They also highlighted the consistent naming pattern of their previous products, all following a four letter format. They also underlined the fact that the trademark was registered before its utilisation in the market.

    With the injunction now upheld against Kinetic Green Energy, the legal proceedings continue as the commercial court proceeds with the hearing. Both parties are expected to present further arguments and evidence to support their respective claims, marking the continuation of this trademark dispute.

    Copyright (c) Autocar Professional. All rights reserved.

    Comments

    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Bike Price

    Poll of the month

    What do you think of the Jaguar rebrand?

    It's too radical and ignores the brand's legacy

     

    57.14%

    It's exactly what's needed to revive a dying brand

     

    9.82%

    It's fine as long as the products are good

     

    33.04%

    Total Votes : 112
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe