Supreme Court orders F1 to pay income tax in India

    Tax rate levied at 40 percent plus interest for 2011-2013 India races; may sound death knell for future races.

    Published On Apr 26, 2017 05:35:00 PM

    7,586 Views

    Supreme Court orders F1 to pay income tax in India

    In yet another blow to Formula 1’s prospects in India, the Supreme Court of India has deemed the Formula One World Championship Limited (FOWC) a permanent establishment in India, and as such liable to pay tax on the income accrued by it here.

    According to the Supreme Court ruling, the Buddh International Circuit (BIC) is a permanent establishment for FOWC, a fixed place of business that causes the creation of value-added or income tax.

    While the amount of taxable income is still to be assessed, the rate of tax levied will by 40 percent, along with interest that will be charged in addition to the tax. Moreover, payments made by the Jaypee Group (owner of BIC) to FOWC for the use of logos and symbols will also be treated as business income and not royalties, as they were used for hosting the event and not for intellectual property purpose. All of this comes after the Delhi government proposed to levy entertainment tax on F1 races held at BIC.

    The Jaypee Group originally signed a five-year contract with FOWC for hosting five races between 2011 and 2015. This contract, however, was cancelled by FOWC in 2013 owing to red tape and taxation issues.

    The latest Supreme Court decision could very well be a death knell for F1 in India, almost certainly eliminating any near-future probability of the world’s headlining motorsport event gracing Indian soil again.

    Copyright (c) Autocar India. All rights reserved.

    Comments

    ×
    img

    No comments yet. Be the first to comment.

    Ask Autocar Anything about Car and Bike Buying and Maintenance Advices
    Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries?
    Ask Now

    Search By Car Price

    Poll of the month

    What do you think of the Jaguar rebrand?

    It's too radical and ignores the brand's legacy

     

    58.10%

    It's exactly what's needed to revive a dying brand

     

    10.51%

    It's fine as long as the products are good

     

    31.39%

    Total Votes : 704
    Sign up for our newsletter

    Get all the latest updates from the automobile universe