Mahindra XUV 3XO

autocar.india

•2d

Go for the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 AT. The 3XO is the better long-term ownership proposition. The 6-speed torque converter automatic is a proven, robust gearbox that is well suited to both city driving and long highway runs. This Mahindra car also has a wider cabin and better rear seat comfort, which will make those 600km trips to Andhra far more comfortable for you and your family. The Tata Nexon Camo DCA is a good car, and the 360-degree dashcam is a nice feature, but the DCA dual-clutch automatic gearbox is slow shifting and is not as proven as Mahindra's Aisin-sourced torque converter unit. The 3XO also offers strong performance, good ride quality and a solid feature set at this price point. Overall, it is the more dependable and better-rounded choice. The one thing to keep in mind is that the boot is among the smallest in the segment, which could be an issue when travelling with four or five passengers and their luggage.

Mahindra XUV 3XO

Tata Nexon

autocar.india

•2w

Sell the Skoda Kushaq 1.0 TSI AT and keep the Mahindra XUV 3XO AX5 petrol AT. The Kushaq is already four years old and will be around 33,000 km by the time the XEV 9S arrives, so you are already past the steepest part of the depreciation curve. The XUV 3XO is a much newer car with only 12,000 km on the clock, so you are still in the early years of ownership where depreciation is highest. From a financial perspective, it makes more sense to sell the older car and retain the newer one.From a practicality perspective, this Mahindra car is also the better car to keep. It is one of the most spacious compact SUVs in the segment, with a wide cabin that makes it a genuinely comfortable five-seater. It is also a very well-rounded car with good safety credentials and a strong ownership proposition. The Kushaq is slightly larger and more engaging to drive, but those aren't reasons enough to keep it over the 3XO.

Mahindra XEV 9S

Skoda Kushaq

Mahindra XUV 3XO

autocar.india

•3w

Out of the options you've listed, the Nexon 1.2 Turbo DCA and XUV 3XO Turbo AT deliver better value than the Brezza, as far as equipment and performance go. Out of these, the Mahindra XUV 3XO is a solid choice for its smoother, stronger engine and its seamless 6-speed torque converter (automatic). Cabin space is very good, and it drives like a more expensive car, giving you a confident experience be it in the city or out on the highway. Before going ahead, do keep in mind that the XUV's boot is a bit small, fuel efficiency might not be as good as the Brezza's, and Mahindra's service network isn't as widespread as Maruti's. However, on the whole, the XUV feels is a good option, and one that we'd recommend.

Mahindra XUV 3XO

Tata Nexon

Maruti Suzuki Brezza

autocar.india

•3w

The Renault Duster is larger and has a class-best 518-litre boot. Also, its ride-handling balance is among the best in its segment, which makes it ideal for long drives. Yes, the 1.3 Turbo-petrol with the 6-speed dual-clutch transmission will be a bit pricier than the Mahindra car, but if you enjoy driving, it is certainly worth the stretch. Over the XUV 3XO, you also get ventilated front seats and paddle shifters, among other things. Currently, the Duster is offered with two turbo-petrol engines: a 1.0-litre 3-cylinder unit from the Kiger and a 1.3-litre 4-cylinder direct-injection turbo-petrol engine. The Renault Duster mileage ranges from 17.75kpl to 19.41kpl. The 1.0-litre turbo-petrol manual returns 19.41kpl, while the 1.3-litre turbo-petrol delivers 17.75kpl to 18.45kpl, depending on the transmission.You could also consider the new Nissan Tekton, which is a badge-engineered version of the Duster, with a brighter interior (in top-spec variants).

Renault Duster

Nissan Tekton

Mahindra XUV 3XO